I think that this bombastic, obscure, topsy-turving example has been written just for the sake of building a frame for this sole sentence:
"Do you see how the seed of speculation has been planted over the last decades ?"
And what has this:
"LOVE IS NOT A PALPABLE 'THING' TO BLAST, IT IS NOT A PHYSICAL OBJECT TO EXPLODE LIKE A STAR. LOVE HAS NO SIZE, LET ALONE A GIANT SIZE OR A DWARF SIZE. LOVE IS NOT RED. THE COLOR OF LOVE IS WHITE OR VIOLET, NEVER RED. RED IS THE COLOR OF FURY. YOU KNOW IT"
to do with all the babble of the above? Granted that western scientists are practically clueless about what a philosophy of life really is, and granted that the story of the star of Bethlehem is a lie without any true astrological basis... should I visualize "stock of knowledge measuring" and "stance towards western science fishing?"
No comments:
Post a Comment