12-E THERE IS NO "GOING BACK HOME" - 2. "GOING BACK HOME" VERSUS VAMPIRISM

"In other words, their speculation is capable of producing "vampirism", and this you can apply to literally every case of linguistic prison. Don't believe me : verify yourself. Take a look at pictures of pre-hurricane veterans of OUR SIDE a long time ago, mainly when THEY were young.

Pay attention to reports bringing these pictures from the Fifties, the Sixties, the Seventies, or else do your own research. Analyze their auras. You'll see that everyone of them had "vampirism"."

"And by influencing some society values in distorted ways, they reinforce for your brain the idea of impediment. What is important to say here is that there is no impediment whatsoever for you to do anything, provided that they don't use it later against you."

I accept and share the view of PON pertaining almost all the theories in this section. The objectionable passages are discussed below.

"Kundalinic shells are not 'prizes', 'rewards', 'salaries', 'benefits' or 'gifts' that you could 'receive' in the future, with or without the illusion of "auric death". Realize that there is no receiving and no winning at all. There is no "lottery" in the Backstage. Shells are just modeling clays. And nobody really cares about you in the Stage World. Not one of their characters gives a penny for you in the Stage World.

Do you believe that you have an impediment to have this relationship with a kundalinic shell of your beloved one in the Stage World ? Ask yourself. Do you believe you need it to reduce your vampirism ? Ask yourself."

I think this section is one of the most enlightened of the whole ebook. Perhaps it is, but I do not think that "kundalinic shells" cannot be idealized as "prizes" or "rewards." It may be that they are not actually prizes, but I do think that when "loved ones" are involved one can idealize them as prizes and rewards. And the struggle or "competition" for obtaining that loved shell, can be also idealized. One may not be the only one who has chosen a determined person to be her or his "loved one." In that case, one will have to win the "loved one." Assuming that one does not know the intentions of the "loved one" about her or his love. Besides, does "loved one" mean a relation, physical or protospiritual, where the two persons are completely sure of the of the exclusivity of the other's feelings towards oneself?

I am afraid that PON gives too much importance to the common, base feelings of the dregs of society and spirituality. I note it because I used to overdo it as well. Now I am taking the toil of dissecting PON's entire ebook because I doubt I will find again somebody expressing my own 'paranoid delusions' in the precise, exact way PON does. There is a great cure for all of the bad things enumerated in PON's ebook, and that cure is the obliteration of one's ego and pursuing of one's ideals blindly, with eyes and ears closed to both "stage" and "nagual realities." But sometimes it is not possible to do it. Or, in any other case, it may not be desirable for oneself.

"Depending on the case, THEY will say : that shell is too young for you, too old for you; too pretty (or handsome) for you, too ugly for you; that shell is famous and you're not; that character is poor (if you're rich) or vice-versa; that shell is black (if you're white, for instance) or vice-versa; that character is Jew (if you were created in a christian family or depending on the country you live if you were born in an arab family) or vice-versa; the character of that shell "doesn't combine" with yourself, and so on.

The point is : do you have any prejudice concerning age, race, sex, attributes of the character like job (if applicable), social class, nationality, "personality", "preferences" in the Stage World, likes and dislikes, little manias, etc. ?"

If one starts making a list of attitudes, like this prejudices that one has to bear in both "nagual reality" and "stage reality" as one being "THEIR" victim, one may find that dozens of attempts at washing one's brain are done to one daily. The only remedy being moving elsewhere; a place where you live among equals. A place where you do not need to suffer a society, a workplace, and a neighborhood where "THEY" and "THEIR characters" are "dealing with your case."

"Remember : the hurricane is over in your city and probably in your entire country. The secret Cold War is practically over in the Stage World. The OTHER SIDE can no longer manipulate neutrals and use them to turn the things you do in the Stage World against you. The characters of OUR SIDE are not sadistic monsters. Whatever you do, do with Love. The rule of the Backstage is Love."

As of the writing of this I cannot comprehend completely the concept of "hurricane." I do not feel any of the few things that happened in the world, that I witnessed or felt, as this so-called "hurricane." What are the readers of the ebook expected to think "the hurricane" is? I could not do another thing than interpret it in my way. The point that I do not share about it, is of it happening at once for a determined group of people only, mainly geographically. I think that "the hurricane" may be: a spiritual awakening, a metaphysical turning point of life, a crisis period, the moment one joins a cult, a traumatic experience and so on... but I am sure I am missing the point. If some day PON becomes available for questions, she/he must be questioned about details on "the hurricane." Does PON mean a real hurricane that devastates a place and, letting the people without nothing, forces the victims to experience "a complete paradigm shift" of their life?

12-E THERE IS NO "GOING BACK HOME" - 1. GENERAL CONCEPTS

Seemingly, the manners of "THEM" for brain washing one with the "GOIN BACK HOME" technique are true. I say this from a point of view of remembering personal experiences. I lived some times the symptoms and upon verification I was very deluded and dumbfounded when I realized that there was no real basis for a resurgence of... my love for ex-girlfriends. Thus feeling the, dubiously real, "auric death." This happened to me when I was still a jivan. These situations, in which brain washings forced me into, were like teachings on themselves, about the futility of trying the relive dead love that before was alive but it was not anymore. But, for PON, the only "continuity" that is allowed is an ever changing one that cannot allow any reliving of the past?

Why? Take for instance the example of one who decides to write her or his own biography. Indefectibly one is going to relive the past. It will be in the mind, reckoning memories, but it will be a reliving of the past after all. And what is wrong with that?

When PON denies the existence of "biography" and "continuity" in the "nagual reality", PON is denying the personal development that jivan persons or illumined persons may have achieved through the years. Remember that, nevertheless, the situation of being a jivan soul does not imply that the person is, invariably, mentally or emotionally deaf-mute. One given person, being jivanmukta or not may carry on a protospiritual life and, possessing a protospiritual 'personality', may have had developed a 'spiritual biography' after any deeds in the "nagual reality." Whether if a personality and a "biography" in the "nagual reality" may prove noxious to a jivan because of all the negative mind sets brought about by the individuated stance towards life, or not, is just a case of personal, egoistic protospiritual seeking.

I think that after all this ebook is totally detrimental to the protospiritual, psychologic and social development of a person in need of some transcendental advise. PON embellishes some very unlucky things, like mental implants and indoctrinating brain washings, as just "character guidelines", I think it is very serious... sections like this one let me thinking about the intentions of PON. Was PON's intention to figure some day in the list of the books most detrimental to human evolution?

"When you have your crystal activated, access to the pigeon-holes stored in your brain and also to the Backstage itself, you'll be able to play characters in the Stage World, to have your shell changed and also to make use of particular abilities the same way Neo and Trinity did in "The Matrix" when accessing instant "programs" to learn things."

Here the author promises the readers a future on some invented mystical Cyberland that I doubt exists. One can change one's shell, that is accepted. But my personal, painful experience is that having "pigeon holes", if it is that they are what I think they are, may prove useful for gaining ability "to play characters in the stage world", but the other powers, namely "to have your shell changed" (in the way propounded by the author's examples) and to make "use of particular abilities in the same way Neo and Trinity did" like somersaulting from a building's roof to other roof and stopping bullets with the power of thought? And the only thing one needs to achieve that is an "alien crystal" in the brain? Give me a break.

Besides, here, PON begins the delusive and obscure use of the word "crystal". I could not get the concept of what a "crystal" is until I re-readed the parts in the ebook where it is named again and again. PON, elsewhere in the book, says that a "crystal" is either "an alien crystal implanted in your brain by aliens" or "technology." The conclusion I have arrived to, after many interpretations is that these said "crystals" are implanted in the aliens' victims by means of either a physical or an astral 'operation'. Other rationales, those that I first thought of, were that the "crystal" is simply TV, radio and Internet or even that the "crystal" is one's capability to reflect sensations, feelings and emotions. But seemingly, the sense in which PON talks about it is in the sense of alien "technology" implanted in one's brain, literally.

"You're a survivor of the hurricane, and THEY are all characters. THEY are all pretending, like phantoms around you, and they read your mind all the time, manipulating it and your thoughts through the association of ideas, double-talk and artificial synchronicity.

Pavlov did this to mice in a lab, manipulating only acts and behaviors instead of thoughts. Is that how do you want to feel ? Like a rat in a maze ?

Ask yourself : do you trust their characters ? Do you think they are reliable ? They want to manipulate your brain and induce you to take your aura to the altar of sacrifices. Their characters do not want you to be happy. They want to deceive you, they want to take energy from you. Stay alert. Watch out."

If one interprets this and where it reads "characters" one thinks of mosquito-brained automatons, that only do and know what the systems of mind control dictates them and lets them know, then I think this passages are fairly acceptable for their coherence. I wonder in which ways PON is cataloged in the Internet for his or her writings, but I think that the ruthless label of "schizophrenic", among many others, that I have read do PON no justice at all. But lets not call PON a prodigy neither, because "the praises are false."
Yet, I share this view of "THEIR" characters.

12-D KUNDALINI IS NO FIRE - KUNDALINI AND SHELLS POTENCY

"Wait .... This part is pending.."